Remembering Bapu
If the Government must indulge in tokenism on Gandhi Jayanti, it would be more
appropriate if it encouraged government employees to spend that one day cleaning up
their messy offices and toilets with their own hands and observe a maun vrat
(silence fast) on October 2. If those in power learnt to pay tribute to Gandhi's
life by simple gestures like inculcating respect for physical cleanliness and
encouraging their employees to keep their tables, their office rooms, corridors and
toilets clean and orderly, it might trigger off a major transformation in their
mind-set. A person who spends long hours everyday of his working life amidst the
squalor, disorder and filth that have become the hallmarks of our sarkari offices
is bound to have very low self-esteem. And people with low self-esteem easily
become petty tyrants and extortionists.
It is unfortunate that very few people take Gandhi's philosophy seriously enough to
make it a guide for action in their own lives. Instead, it has become fashionable
to cynically use his martyrdom as a sword to fight political battles with one's
opponents, as is happening in the controversy surrounding Veer Savarkar's role in
the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
I honestly don't care whether Savarkar was implicated by association rather than
active collaboration with Godse who assassinated Gandhi. In fact, those who killed
Gandhi did India a favour by saving him from the ignominy of total marginalisation
by his own Party as India came near Independence. After he had served their
purpose, most Congressmen who took over the reins of power seemed to have found his
services, his philosophy, and his ideas altogether redundant and dispensable. Had
he lived longer, he would have probably been prevented from playing a meaningful
role in the nation's affairs - just as he was pushed aside on the issue of
Partition.
The conduct of the Congress Party had so begun to depress Bapu that he recommended
it be disbanded as a Party and give way to new political formations. He appealed to
all those who genuinely believed in the Congress ideology to go out and involve
themselves in the task of rural reconstruction and work for gram swaraj.
Unfortunately, all the causes dear to his heart, including his emphasis on probity
in public life suffered neglect after Independence. Consequently, the image of
politicians took a nosedive in post-Independence India. For example, in the heydays
of the freedom movement, Indian films would depict a khadi wearing person with a
Gandhi cap on his head as a symbol of the spirit of freedom, a belief in swadeshi,
a commitment to selflessly serving the poor and the deprived. However, in today's
Bollywood films, a person sporting these symbols is commonly used as a symbol of
hypocrisy, greed and corruption.
It is because his own Party stopped taking him seriously that most young people in
India grow up thinking of Gandhi as a pious crank with very little relevance for
the modern world. Even though many of the most important world leaders and
statesmen and women who have played a creative moral role in shaping world history
- be it Nelson Mandela, Vaclav Havel, Aung Sang Sun Kui or the Dalai Lama - draw
their inspiration from Gandhi or feel connected with his world view, in our own
country Gandhi is either worshipped in caricatured form or used as a meaningless
icon. His name is often dragged in to fight partisan battles unrelated to his
values and example.
The neglect of Gandhi's ideas and philosophy is also evident from the fact that we
do not have even one world class institution in India doing research in Gandhi's
philosophy. Institutions built in Gandhi's memory such as the Gandhi Peace
Foundation and Gandhi Pratishthan are suffering callous neglect and indifference.
Compare the research facilities they collectively offer with institutions named
after Jawahar Lal Nehru such as the Nehru Memorial Library and Research Centre and
you realize how little Gandhi matters for today's Congressmen. Let the Congress
Party do a rough and ready survey to find out how many young Congressmen -
corporators, district chiefs, even the new generation of ministers - have ever
seen, leave alone read a book on or by Gandhi and whether they believe his ideas
have anything to offer them in their own battle for survival within the Congress
Party.
A timely favour
Instead of lashing out at the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha for the murder of Gandhi, the
Congress Party owes them a debt of gratitude because had Gandhi stayed alive, he is
likely to have led satyagraha after satyagraha against the Congress government's
policies in post-Independence India. The Pakistani ruling establishment could get
away with jailing their Frontier Gandhi ,Abdul Ghaffar Khan, for most of his life.
However, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi could not have been subdued by such means.
Therefore, his assassination was a timely favour for the Congress Party. By making
him a martyr, Godse helped the Congress set him aside, put him up on a meaningless
pedestal, pay token tributes to his memory once or twice a year and occasionally
use his quotations in speeches delivered in international fora to try to convince
the rest of the world that the Indian government occupies high moral ground.
It is because his own Party stopped taking him seriously that most young people in
India grow up thinking of Gandhi as a pious crank with very little relevance for
the modern world.
However, with all their flaws, Congressmen still have some legitimate claim to the
legacy of Gandhi. Some in the Party, like the late Rajiv Gandhi and his helpmate
Mani Shankar Aiyar, at least salvaged a small part of Gandhi's vision of gram
swaraj to push for a measure of devolution of powers to Panchayats. But it is
indeed sad to see the selective use of Gandhi by the Communists despite the fact
that they were no less contemptuous of Gandhi in his lifetime than the worthies of
the RSS. They called him an agent of the bourgeoisie, a running dog of imperialism,
a class enemy of the poor and toiling masses. They accused Gandhi of unleashing the
forces of obscurantism in Indian politics by mixing religion with politics. Their
character assassination of Gandhi has proved more deadly than the actual
assassination by Godse who with that one bullet confirmed Gandhi's status as an
epochal world hero. By contrast, the character assassination of Gandhi by the Left
encouraged an atmosphere of arrogance and disdain towards Gandhi by the educated
elites of India. Even today for most leftists Gandhi is relevant only for the
purpose of taking pot shots at the Sangh Parivar. If they take basic elements of
Gandhi's vision seriously, their ideological core mandating permanent class war
can not be sustained .
Those who romanticise violence against "class enemies" as a revolutionary act and
have a tradition of celebrating bomb-throwing leaders and cadres as national
heroes, do not have the moral right to condemn the cult of violence preached by the
self styled revolutionaries of the Hindutva brigade. If one is not as unconditional
as Gandhi in accepting non-violence as an article of faith in politics, one has no
moral rights to condemn others for using violence, simply because their notion of
wrong doers is different.
This is not at all to say Gandhi was above criticism. He made many blunders - some
Herculean ones - as for example, his launching of the Khilafat movement without
understanding its implications either for India or for Turkey, his mishandling of
Jinnah, and his refusal to accept the Motilal Nehru-Jinnah formulation on dominion
status as an interim arrangement which might well have averted the Partition.
However, those of us who take Gandhi seriously with all his limitations ought not
to use him for partisan purposes. Instead we should focus on imbibing in our own
lives the following basic principles that would show that we respect Gandhi's
message and methods:
Adopt truth and non-violence as the guiding principles of all our actions and
thoughts. This includes avoiding exaggeration, refraining from overstating our
case. Most important of all, we must refrain from demonising our opponents.
Ensure that the gap between our practice and our precept is as narrow as possible.
If we lead by example, rather than sermons, people will more readily forgive us our
mistakes, especially if we have the humility and honesty to openly admit them
rather than adopt an offensive strategy to cover up for our errors.
Build a politics around consensus and try to win over our opponents with sound
reasoning, by grounding our politics on principles of fair play and justice, rather
than trying to browbeat them into submission or silence by virulent attack.
Treat politics as a sacred mission, rather than as a means to acquire the power to
manipulate and subjugate fellow citizens. Power should be perceived as a limited
and sacred trust rather than a means for self-aggrandisement.
Weigh each issue on merit and come up with creative solutions to problems rather
than judge each issue through the prism of deadening ideologies, which become a
substitute for creative ideas and promote servility of thought and emotion. The
dead hand of ossified ideologies only creates stalemates and civil strife, which
prevent India from moving along the path of progress and prosperity. Gandhi's truth
was based on his attempts to understand and be finely tuned to the needs and
aspirations of his people. He succinctly expressed his scepticism of ideology
driven people in the following words: "I have a horror of all isms, especially
those that attach themselves to proper names".
Madhu Purnima Kishwar
|